On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:35:05AM +0200, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Martin Dengler > <mar...@martindengler.com> wrote: > > Of course. That's why I'm asking these questions, since we know SL > > doesn't want to become a distro generator, but we're getting questions > > that push us in those directions. > > I didn't know SL was trying to avoid that role.
I am of course not an authoritative source. But that is my impression, yes (and it's bourne out by dfarning's reply, IMO). > But there is _nobody > else_ really looking at how (whether!) the integration works. That a > desktop works or doesn't work is a job of integration. Hence the reason for me asking the questions. I think SoaS, as a Fedora-derivative anyway, is the right place to do it. > So somebody has to do it. Indeed. I don't think it's actually that big of a technical deal to *do* the things I asked about, but *supporting* them is a pretty big deal. That's why I asked. > If SL does it, SL has a chance to ensure the quality. If SL doesn't > do it, who will? Maybe SL should do it until a focused team takes > over the distro side? Good subjects for discussion. > cheers, > m Martin
pgpv6OYxcoCr5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel