-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 01:02:16PM +0100, victor.lazzar...@nuim.ie wrote: >Crude Hack? I am sorry? I spent a few months last year producing >the olpcsound Fedora package, thanks very much. That is no hack.
No _I_ am sorry. And apologize for my bogus fingerpointing! I confused this issue with that of libabiword, where the authors wrote the following comment in the Makefile for the library: > # Hack together a shared library for testing purposes (e.g. olpc). I found that note when investigating why the library was only built shared, not also static as is required in Debian. Confusion is no excuse for my bad behavior - I only include the reason in an attempt to explain where it came from (i.e. not entirely out of the blue, and related to Sugar, but unrelated to CSound). Again: Please do accept my apology. Kind regards, - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkn1rqEACgkQn7DbMsAkQLhfZACgji+y8D5eySme2UeodNWX3vIu 48QAnAjIS7CvmT6N796pLArrikfo8lcK =6uMX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
