On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 03:43:37PM +0200, Bert Freudenberg wrote: > On 28.04.2009, at 15:33, SugarLabs Bugs wrote: > >> #795: Lack of setup.py in Etoys-101.tar.gz >> Ticket URL: <http://dev.sugarlabs.org/ticket/795#comment:3> > > > So the "fix" is to include this three-line script: > > #!/usr/bin/python > from sugar.activity import bundlebuilder > bundlebuilder.start() > > That does not make sense to me. Why should each and every activity > bundle include the same script?
In that case user(not only packager) has a standard way to bundle installed activity(by command "./setup.py dist_xo") despite of the nature of this activity. Packager can have standard way to install it by command "./setup.py install" as well -- Aleksey _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
