Unless there is a good reason, I would say no. Maintaining an upstream release date is an important planning tool for all of Sugar Labs' downstream partners and users.
david On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Bernie Innocenti <ber...@codewiz.org> wrote: > Shall we re-adjust our schedule accordingly? > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: One week slip of Fedora 11 Release > Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 14:29:23 -0700 > From: Jesse Keating <jkeat...@redhat.com> > Reply-To: fedora-l...@redhat.com > Organization: Red Hat > To: fedora-announce-l...@redhat.com, fedora-devel-annou...@redhat.com, > fedora-test-l...@redhat.com > > In a meeting today between Release Engineering, QA, and various team > leads, we decided to enact a 7 day slip of the Fedora 11 release date. > The primary reason behind this slip is the state of our blocker bug: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=F11Blocker&hide_resolved=1 > We cannot begin Release Candidate phase until the blocker bugs are > closed or at least in MODIFIED state. We are not there today, which > would be our last day to enter RC phase and still have enough time to > release on the 26th. We hope to enter RC phase in the next couple days, > and hit our new target, June 2nd. > > Freeze breaks for critical bugs will still be accepted, however trivial > bug fixes should be pushed as updates via bodhi. Thanks! > > -- > Jesse Keating > Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! > identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating > > > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel