On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 20:04, Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: RIPEMD160 > > On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 07:30:15PM +0200, Bernie Innocenti wrote: >>On 05/23/09 19:16, Bernie Innocenti wrote: >>> I couldn't get this to boot, it hangs some time after the grub menu. >>> But it might be because qemu is broken in Fedora 11. >> >>Oh, wait! It was just damn slow because I wasn't using kvm >>(permissions issue). >> >>Now I could test it, and it looks good, modulo the bugs that Tomeu and >>Gary reported. TurtleArt would work for me, but the window was >>mispositioned. >> >>I'd say: let's switch early in the 0.86 release cycle, as soon as we've >>shaked the major bugs, so activity maintainers have time to fix the >>remaining issues in their code. > > Do you really mean to say that switching window manager should be done > in a stable environment? Or did you mean to suggest swtiching early > _after_ the 0.86 release?
I guess Bernie meant to switch early in the 0.85 cycle (so now). >>The only thing I didn't like very much is memory usage: 21MB VIRT, 10MB >>RSS. But I suppose we can't do much about it. > > Is the purpose to switch from one specific window manager to another > specific one, or to move towards working properly with any > EWMH-compliant window manager (and just picking one of them by default)? I would say the later. > GNOME can work with different window managers too, even if it ships with > this one as default. Would be great if the choice of window manager could be left to integrators, I'm not sure it will be possible given our possible needs but I would say it's worth trying. Regards, Tomeu > > - Jonas > > - -- > * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt > * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ > > [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEAREDAAYFAkoYOssACgkQn7DbMsAkQLjXAQCeLGCK7GvW7PnLxRxg5GO++lg+ > TQsAoJZ0RdYsWOleadgD+2Rbl0LyTkte > =Dq8b > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel