Hi, >> I completely disagree. >> >> To me, SoaS is a specific distribution coined by Sugar >> enthusiasts (who happen to also most/all of them also to be >> Sugar developers).
> I disagree as well. I'm quite satisfied with SugarLabs' support > and usage of the SoaS .ISO as produced by sdz and its team, > especially because the largest distributor of Sugar continues to > use the same base distro on its laptops. Disagreement thirded. "Sugar on a Stick" is a reasonable proper noun; it's not like "Fedora on a Stick" or "openSUSE on a Stick" are in use, which would be a convincing argument towards the phrase being generic. I think that one of the reasons the name was chosen was due to the pun of a lollipop being "sugar on a stick", so the name's specific to Sugar in that way. I think SoaS has been widely understood to refer to a set of popular Fedora builds that Sugar Labs (rather than a distribution) creates itself, as a product. It might have been good to pick a different name in the beginning, but it doesn't seem like it's worth changing that now. - Chris. -- Chris Ball <c...@laptop.org> _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel