On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 07:41:33PM -0400, Caroline Meeks wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Nod, I've done that for Memorize and maybe we will for Paint too. It > > will > > > take some thought to get it right and I've got a lot on my plate right > > now. > > > Worth it if it turns into code but right now I'm wondering what is the > > best > > > path forward? Sugarizing Tux, Improving Paint or adding features to > > Colors? > > > It mostly depends on what programmers out there are interested. > > > > If Tuxpaint satisfies all needs and new features list for Paint and > > Colors! is not short, I guess its much easier to add save-to-journal > > feature to Tuxpaint. > > > I just spent some time with Tuxpaint. I like it much better then paint. > More features and they are easier to use. We asked the students to create a > picture for vocabulary words. I think some of the stamp features and such in > Tuxpaint would have helped some of the kids without as much native atistic > talent to still produce recognizable results. I think the artists are going > to go wild with some of the magic features. It really looks like fun. > > I don't know how well it will work on a small screen like an XO or netbook. > Maybe someone else can take a look?
its easy to test in sugar-emulator: $ sugar-emulator -i 640x480 I run Tuxpaint in 640x480 and it looks nice(Tuxpaint scales pretty well) -- Aleksey _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
