Hi, I think the version jump is intentional to allow for intermediate stable releases targetted for 0.84 if the need arises. If someone finds a critical issue in Browse 103, Simon can always release 104 with the fix and nothing more. -sdg-
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Christoph Derndorfer<[email protected]> wrote: > Out of curiosity: How did we end up at Browse-110? > Maybe I missed something here but wasn't the latest version 102, 103 or > something when this issue was last discussed less than 72 hours ago? > Slightly confused, > Christoph > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Simon Schampijer <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> == Source == >> >> >> http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Browse/Browse-110.tar.bz2 >> >> == News == >> Toolbar redesign >> _______________________________________________ >> Sugar-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > > > -- > Christoph Derndorfer > co-editor, olpcnews > url: www.olpcnews.com > e-mail: [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > -- Sayamindu Dasgupta [http://sayamindu.randomink.org/ramblings] _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
