On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 11:18:55PM +0200, Sean DALY wrote: > Bill - I completely agree our numbering systems are byzantine and > difficult to grasp... there is the Sugar version number, the Fedora > version number, the OLPC-OS version number and the XO build number.
The numbering is for developers...why are we having this discussion at a marketing level? Developers can appreciate the difference between each of those numbers, and each of them is precise*. The SoaS strawberry ISO is called soas-strawberry.iso: http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/releases/ No "byzantine" numbers in sight. > thanks > > Sean Martin * Two of the four aren't even relevant to SoaS. I fail to see why throwing unrelated numbers around helps this discussion or contributes to a "Byzantine" SoaS numbering scheme.
pgpvSvEEXKWjq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
