2009/9/16 Sebastian Dziallas <sebast...@when.com>: > Args! I notice that what I asked could have been misunderstood. I didn't > mean to imply SoaS being only way of distributing Sugar. That's out of > question and was never my intention. I apologize for any confusion if this > feeling has been created.
I don't think anyone interpreted your question in this way. > I wonder, though, if the current SoaS is going to be the primary LiveUSB > distribution of Sugar supported by upstream (known as SoaS). I think Sugar should treat all downstreams equally, so there would be no primary distro. But users/deployments may prefer one or the other based on quality/performance/stability/.... > Daniel, yes, I think this question needs to be asked. I still don't understand how this affects the work your doing from anything other than a prosperity standpoint. Daniel _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel