Michael Stone wrote: > As for interpreters -- I absolutely agree that they should be chosen > carefully. > I just think that the interpreter that we choose carefully should be the > one > that prepares to run a program (e.g. by fetching and installing it, or by > caching it, etc) rather than the one that runs it. > > Does this distinction make sense?
I'm not sure I understand you. My feeling is that the most important thing we can do in this area is to make it easy to write Activities that are intrinsically cross-platform. To borrow a phrase, one way to do this is to choose languages, and interpreters, that are incapable of expressing platform dependencies.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
