On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 6:39 AM, Bernie Innocenti <ber...@codewiz.org> wrote: > Zero Install appears to have identified reasonable compromises for many > of these trade-offs. While I'm not yet claiming that z-i would be a
(Keeping it in the Sugar side... ) I think it's a very good idea to look into a userdir-centric packaging system such as z-i. There are of course a few other alternatives, and very well considered critiques of these systems (from OS-centric packagers usually ;-) ) so we don't have to hope we've diagnosed all the potentiall pitfalls -- others have. So a couple of questions -- out of curiosity, no intention to start a flamefest. - Is anything making z-i specially interesting? - What pitfalls will our individual end users and deployment teams face with it? cheers, m -- martin.langh...@gmail.com mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel