On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 11:31:43PM +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 2:00 AM, Aleksey Lim <alsr...@member.fsf.org> wrote: > > I've coded[1] initial implementation[2] for "standalone" 0install mode, > > w/o any support from shell. So, activity could bundle saccharin module > > to .xo and maybe 0install pure python library as well(otherwise system > > should have already installed zeroinstall-injector package, it could be > > any version - saccharin will update it from the web on the first start). > > Sounds like a fantastic development. I personally won't be able to > review/test/use for a while but as Wade mentions, not needing explicit > support from Sugar is a great, and avoids a ton of bootstrapping > issues.
BTW that's driving me to second evolution of Unified Objects -> Journal Plugins -> and now, just a Shell Integration API, thanks! I'm going to post corrective message to "[FEATURE] Journal Plugins" thread.. -- Aleksey _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel