On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 06:44:36PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote: > > Sugar Bundles: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Sugar_Bundles > ---> Original request cam up to simplify the ASLO updater > (infrastructure request) > ---> we agreed in the goal itself, we would like to know how important > it is for a deployment to know if we better do it now or later > ---> request feedback from deployers on the ml
Just to make clear initial intention, this is not about using *only* bundles to keep metadata info out of sugar, e.g. in case of http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/1636, bundles are not useful. So we can use both methods and make this using smooth. But since bundles also useful e.g. for uploding sugar objects to/from file servres etc., if could be useful is using one bundle type instead of .xo, .xol and .xoj bundles. So we can move difference betwean various bundles usage(for activities, libraries, Journal objects) to choosing the right set of METADATA fields http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Sugar_Bundles#Specification -- Aleksey _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel