On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 3:06 AM, Simon Schampijer <si...@schampijer.de> wrote: > On 02/04/2010 01:38 AM, Walter Bender wrote: >> >> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Simon Schampijer<si...@schampijer.de> >> wrote: >>> >>> On 02/03/2010 09:15 PM, Walter Bender wrote: >>>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Simon Schampijer<si...@schampijer.de> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> today is Feature Freeze [1]! Here is a status on the pending features >>>>> [2]: >>>>> >>>>> *** 3G Support >>>>> The 3G Feature has been landed. Some improvements for this Feature are >>>>> pending. >>>>> >>>>> *** Enhanced color selector >>>>> The enhanced color selector has seen some design iterations over the >>>>> last two weeks. A decision needs to be made which design is picked and >>>>> the code needs to be reviewed. We have to work together closely now to >>>>> land this. >>>>> >>>>> *** Write to journal anytime >>>>> No patch has been made to try the behavior to display the Journal when >>>>> closing for the first time. This looks rather unlikely to land. >>>> >>>> I have a simple patch that enables the naming alert to be activated >>>> from the toolbar at anytime and not automatically activated on stop. >>>> Would such a patch be considered for 0.88 and we can revisit for 0.90? >>>> (Note that this is a feature that originated in the field.) >>>> >>>> -walter >>> >>> I agree, this is as an important issue to solve. What about having a >>> button >>> going to the Journal detail view of the entry? This is the logical place >>> to >>> make such additions. >>> >>> Or how do you like the idea to have an option in the activity toolbar for >>> the description [1]? And adding later one for the tags, too? >> >> >> I think this is more than adequate. I would have it be additive rather >> than editing the entire description on the toolbar. >> >> -walter > > Good point, yeah we can see how we represent that best (maybe someone can > generate a mockup). > > I remember someone had worries about screen size, especially for old-style > activities that has only one tab (since we add another button). We have to > check for that. For new-style activities it works fine as we have the > activity toolbar.
Maybe we should hold a marathon weekend of coding to bring all the old activities up to date? It would be nice to be able to phase out the old toolbar. It is a bounded task. -walter > Regards, > Simon > > > > -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel