Aleksey Lim wrote: > * the major issue here that ASLO is not particalr deployment oriented > portal, e.g. in OLPC case, mentioned issue is mostly means nothing > since OLPC can effectively add/remove any component they think is > useful for their users
I don't understand this claim. ASLO is seeing literally millions of downloads from OLPC deployments. Probably 99% of ASLO traffic is from OLPC's users. As for the rest... I think .xo bundles should be absolutely free of binary executables, or anything else that depends on more than the Sugar Platform. We should then introduce a different (better!) bundle format that supports such dependencies, based on 0bundle, 0install, etc. As a temporary codename, call it ".x0". --Ben
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
