frederick wrote: > On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Simon Schampijer <si...@schampijer.de>wrote: > > > On 04/27/2010 08:54 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote: > > > >> ... > > > > > > What is missing is a badge to indicate if the network is active (someone has > > created the adhoc network already). Any good ideas how that badge could > > look > > like? > > > > Shouldn't ad-hoc network icons be gray if empty/inactive and colored by the > creator's Sugar Learner colors once created? > > If the creator's beacon stops, then subsequent beaconer's colors might be > adopted (if you want to extract that information)[1]. Although, the color > change may be the source of some confusion.
why would anyone care who "created" an ad-hoc network? by their nature (from a user's perspective) they're anonymous, especially in this case, where their names (as i understand it) are pre-configured. paul =--------------------- paul fox, p...@laptop.org _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel