On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 00:02, Bernie Innocenti <ber...@codewiz.org> wrote: > El Fri, 14-05-2010 a las 08:59 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso escribió: >> I'm just asking for someone to propose a set of concrete and coherent >> changes to the current process, is it really asking too much? >> >> I'm sorry but I cannot go through the old threads, ask individuals for >> clarifications, then draft that new process myself. > > Do you want the proposal posted to the wiki? > > We could basically take Sasha's original plan and copy it to the wiki. I > think it was quite well thought: > > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2010-April/023410.html > > I propose the following amendments: > > 1) Scrap the paragraph saying that any sugar developer can approve > changes, because it turned out to be a controversial point. The "who" > and the "where" of reviews are orthogonal topics that can be discussed > independently. > > 2) Also scrap the part where Sascha proposes ways to track patches in > the list, since we can now use Patchwork for this. > > 3) Add all the clarifications in my follow-up to Sascha's proposal: > > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2010-April/023468.html > > 4) The existing conventions still apply for referencing tickets in the > commit logs > > 5) When a corresponding ticket exists, the committer should add a link > to the patch discussion in Patchwork before committing the patch. > > Does this sound good enough for an initial iteration? If so, I could > take care of transcribing it into the wiki. Then, we can further refine > the process as we go.
Hi Bernie, I think this is an excellent step forward, I really appreciate you having taken the time to do this. I still need to explore patchwork further and I'm a bit concerned about requiring that reviewers amend the commit message but I'm willing to give it a test drive and see how it works in real. I'm looking forward for the new text proposal. Regards, Tomeu > -- > // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ > \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ > > _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel