Glad you sorted it out. On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 11:00:43PM -0400, Art Hunkins wrote: > Simple enough: just add "master" to the end of your first git push > command. (I believe it's only necessary for the initial commit.)
Yes, because there is no "master" ref in the remote repo - it's empty of commit objects and refs that might name them. > I had not run across this requirement before anywhere in the git > repository itself. Which requirement? If you see 'just add[ing] "master"' as "a requirement" you're missing the point of what "git push" does. One always is telling git to push _to_ a *ref* (e.g., "master") - it just was implied / defaulted sensibly before so you may not have realised what ref git was choosing for you. Try to push from a branch named one thing in your local repo but a different thing on the remote repo without understanding what "git push origin master" means - you'll be hopelessly confused :). > One of the problems I've encountered is that it's difficult to find > specific info in the wiki - especially when you don't know your > precise problem. That's why I suggested re-reading your favorite git tutorial and asking oneself "what could I be overlooking?". The git man pages reward educated study - not easy when one is frustrated at a distracting problem, I admint. > Art Hunkins Martin
pgpTyz3fXkndi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel