On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 16:59, C. Scott Ananian <csc...@laptop.org> wrote: > I don't know about RH, but @ litl we're using all-introspected > bindings w/ a distro based on Ubuntu Hardy. So "backporting" > shouldn't be too painful, really.
glib sounds to me like the most problematic dependency to backport. I think RHEL's case is a bit different because litl OS is used only by litl but RHEL is supposed to be used in wildly different use cases. But well, that decision belongs to RH. > (Of course, we're not using the python introspection, so you might > have other troubles there.) > > +1 on introspection in general. Hopefully the python introspection > support is sufficiently lazy -- we certainly haven't had any startup > issues w/ gjs. Right now we lazily import anything in the module scope, and eagerly anything inside classes, etc. But this should be reconsidered again when we start profiling real-life apps. There's certainly a big reduction in the work performed at process startup, but the biggest advantage IMO is memory usage. Regards, Tomeu > --scott > > -- > ( http://cscott.net/ ) > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel