On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 4:01 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <to...@sugarlabs.org> wrote: > I tihnk I have been sloppy with my words, so let me clarify two things: > > - killing processes should be done only to avoid OOM (because > currently the kernel kills the wrong thing most of the time).
Can't we just _close it nicely_? I have extremely rarely seen a Sugar app not closing. Sugar shell can decide it's a good idea to close an activity because too many are open and system is under memory pressure. Sugar apps auto-save, so closing nicely should work very nicely... cheers, m -- martin.langh...@gmail.com mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
