This thread has made me wistful. I go to a conference every year called "No Fluff Just Stuff". The guy who runs it has the title "Meme Wrangler". I've had several different titles at my day job, every one more dismal than the last. The work and the pay doesn't change, just the title. What I wouldn't give to be a "Meme Wrangler", or a "Wizard", or a "Lord High Executioner", or even an "Oompah-Loompah", even if the job didn't pay anything.
Maybe that could be an inducement to volunteer for Sugar Labs. Make a significant contribution and somebody in authority, maybe Walter Bender, gives you a cool title. Maybe a signed certificate you could hang in the office of your day job. James Simmons > Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 12:26:33 -0400 > From: Bernie Innocenti <ber...@codewiz.org> > Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] Appropriate to call myself "senior > developer"? > To: Lucian Branescu <lucian.brane...@gmail.com> > Cc: sugar-devel <sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org>, Sascha Silbe > <sascha-ml-reply-to-201...@silbe.org> > Message-ID: <1281889593.1936.237.ca...@giskard> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > El Sun, 15-08-2010 a las 11:41 +0100, Lucian Branescu escribi?: >> > ...as long as I can be "Senior Wizard Extraordinaire and ?berhaxc0r at >> > Sugar Labs and everywhere else" :-) >> >> Calling ourselves wizards would be interesting. > > Oompa-Loompas might be more appropriate :-) > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oompa-Loompa > > -- > // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ > \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel