On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 6:09 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <to...@sugarlabs.org> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 13:08, Bert Freudenberg <b...@freudenbergs.de> wrote: >> >> On 03.09.2010, at 10:47, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 00:10, Bert Freudenberg <b...@freudenbergs.de> wrote: >>>> This is almost the same as my patch from April, which never made it in. >>>> Instead of building from the outdated "olpc" subversion branch, the Squeak >>>> VM is build from a release tarball. >>>> It adds a cmake dependency, and gives an error if make is run without >>>> running autogen.sh first. >>>> Also adds a "clean" make target to please jhbuild. >>> >>> Not sure how relevant it is, but someone at Collabora was adding cmake >>> support to upstream jhbuild recently. >>> >>> http://git.gnome.org/browse/jhbuild/commit/?id=aa564775b5c26527c5ff1d5ad8db8a3565d4dff2 >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Tomeu >> >> Is this an actual objection? What do I need to do to get this patch accepted? > > Was just a comment. > > For the others, Bert has been working with Sascha on this on #sugar. >
I have noticed this happening several times lately. I think many of us have been reading Tomue's comments as objects when in fact many are meant to share information about possible solutions. david PS Bert if you ever need to stall before preparing a talk.... We still need to get squeak into Debian proper. It is packaged and in both debian and ubuntu, but we still need to finish the process of getting approval from the Debian FTP_masters to move squeak for contrib to main. I think the work is 90% done. It is still matter of helping them understand how squeak recursively builds itself and how that process can be monitored for security purposes. The standard packaging model is pristine tarball + patch set. david _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
