On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 16:52, Franco Miceli <fmic...@plan.ceibal.edu.uy> wrote: > Effectively by debugging both Sugar and NM I found that ListConnections > shows all of the favourite connections on connetions.cfg -Double checked > within sugar and in NM- but then NM doesn't pass them to > real_get_best_autoconnection. > > So It's NM's fault, and doesn't involve Sugar. > > I'll report this to NM list and open a ticket in their track. > > Thanks for all your efforts to try to narrow this down.
Nice work, good luck on the other side! Regards, Tomeu > Cheers > > 2010/9/9 James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> >> >> On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 10:26:40AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> > If anybody wants to reproduce James' tests, I would recommend >> > redirecting dbus-monitor to a file and filtering afterwards the >> > unwanted events. >> >> Yes, that's an alternate method, but it doesn't prove execution of code >> in Sugar in response to events. Instrumenting Sugar is fairly easy, >> although it does require a restart. >> >> -- >> James Cameron >> http://quozl.linux.org.au/ >> _______________________________________________ >> Sugar-devel mailing list >> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > > > -- > Ing. Franco Miceli > CITS - Plan Ceibal - Investigación & Desarrollo > Av. Italia 6201 - Montevideo, Uruguay > CP: 11500 > Tel: (598 2) 601 5773 int.: 2227 > > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel