On 09/20/2010 11:10 PM, Sascha Silbe wrote: > Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Mon Sep 20 12:45:28 +0200 2010: > >>> Do you expect only developers of activities in Fructose to follow that >>> process (documented on the Development Team/Release [1] page on the >>> wiki) or others as well? >> >> Ideally all of them, as (a) there are not many activities in Fructose >> and (b) concluding from this thread that the packagers would be happy >> about it. > > Then we need to extend a.sl.o to host source tarballs as well. Right now > activity developers need to either have a sunjammer account or abuse the > wiki if they want to publish tarballs.
Yes, I think that the tarballs would fit there perfectly well. I think we can live with the increased load of the storage demand for each activity (please correct me if that is wrong). If I remember Aleksey correctly, from a technical point of view this would not be a hard thing to do. >>> If the latter, we should start by documenting this requirement. I couldn't >>> find any place in the wiki (that could do with some spring cleaning, BTW) >>> explaining how to get your activity published at all, let alone how to >>> please packagers. >> >> Absolutely, that should be documented. I leave this to the activity >> maintainers and packagers to define that policy and adding a wiki page >> for it - as those are the ones that need to follow it and request it. > > Let's hope the subject drew enough attention to make someone actually > adjust the wiki. Yes, and thanks for helping discussing this. Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel