On 10/07/2010 10:31 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 21:24, Sascha Silbe
<sascha-ml-reply-to-201...@silbe.org> wrote:
Excerpts from simon's message of Wed Oct 06 14:11:04 +0200 2010:
Patch needed in 0.90
AFAICT it's needed on Fedora 14, not Sugar 0.90.
Are we sure yet this was an intentional change by libvte and not just a
mistake? In the latter case we should probably make the setting depend
on specific libvte versions so we don't break if they decide to use a
different set of control codes (=> different $TERM) in the future.
Agreed, I think we should understand well what's going on before
accepting a hack upstream. If we confirm that we need that hack, then
we should put that information in a ticket and reference it from the
code.
Regards,
Tomeu
Agreed, I first thought it was another issue when reading other comments
about it.
I have nailed it down as the following so far:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=631589
Regards,
Simon
_______________________________________________
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
