So the proposed 1.2.3-peru numbering scheme really is a 1.2.3 scheme with an optional trailing taint hint?

It probably makes better sense to clearly distinguish those two essentially separate issues:

  * mainline numbering
    + integer
    + triple integers
    + Debian-style triple string scheme
    + other?
  * how to officially handle "slight forks"
    + extending triple integers with fourth integer/string
    + non-version suffix to version
    + separate field
    + no official support
    + other?

The easiest for Debian would be if you version your code using triple integers, as that properly supports multiple branches (which you _are_ doing, whether you admit it or not!).

debian care not about deployment forks, but I sure recommend that you do support it properly - which means make room for it in the versioning string and admit that forks are versioned too - not only a non-versioned flag.


 - Jonas

--
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Reply via email to