On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:20:22AM +0000, Aleksey Lim wrote: > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 10:51:51AM +1100, James Cameron wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 11:23:46PM +0000, Aleksey Lim wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 09:53:18AM +1100, James Cameron wrote: > > > > These announcements from activities.sugarlabs.org of new releases are > > > > sent without any included identity of the person who did the release. > > > > > > > > Could activities.sugarlabs.org please be changed to include the releaser > > > > in these messages? > > > > > > The problem is that uploaders don't include release notes. The proper > > > fix might be do not accept them (from uploading checks), so patches are > > > welcome :). > > > > No, I think you misunderstand. My observation has nothing to do with > > whether release notes are present in the mail message. > > > > Where's the code? > > http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/slo-activities > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Activity_Library/Devel/Installing
The file site/app/views/editors/email/aslo/release_en_plain.thtml contains what looks like the release messages, but I cannot see where it is used. What is needed is the authenticated user's e-mail address. > But keep in mind that current code is php/cake based and > new ASLO will be based on new AMO python/django code. So, would be > useful if patch is not invasive and might be applied w/o starting new > development/testing/production cycle. That says to me, "don't do anything, your effort will be wasted, nobody else cares about this problem." Thanks for the warning. I see no way forward. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel