On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:06:56AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote: > Martin and I talked for bit this evening and I believe that I managed to > persuade him to support my [UI Dictator team] proposal.
I do, for the reasons mentioned in Michael's "key arguments". > P.S. - Later [...] we discovered a confusion about the mandate of > the proposed committee; to wit: > > Is the main purpose of the committee to act as a UI Maintainer (e.g., by > deciding which UI-related patches to merge) or is the main purpose of the > committee to make UI-related decisions on an as-requested basis? I think it is both act as maintainer and make UI-related decisions. It seems we're re-invented the Design Team. I spoke with Gary Martin and Bernie and, despite having lost the logs of my conversation with Gary, my hazy recollection is that that they also came to this conclusion. With that in mind, I think we should just have more people actively participate in the design team. I'm interested, so have put my name down on http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Design_Team/Contacts#Team_Members . I hope anyone else interested in being active, will do the same. Michael Stone, Bernie Innocenti, I'm looking at you. Gary, can you add / correct anything from our conversation? Michael, is there anything I've misunderstood/misremembered about your proposal? Would you want the Design Team to adopt your "what does the committee do"[1] responsibilities? Martin [1] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2010-November/028615.html
pgpjqwF0R3RbA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel