On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Sascha Silbe <si...@activitycentral.com> wrote: >> The behaviour sought by Aleksey's patch makes sense. I am surprised >> that CWD isn't set to SUGAR_BUNDLE_PATH, maybe that needs to get fixed >> instead. > > Thanks for disproving my assumption that it's something Python 2.x does > differently and pointing at the actual issue. > > I agree that we should either change the working directory or tweak > sys.path, but I'm still a bit worried about compatibility.
Hm. AFAICS, when an activity starts under S-0.84 the cwd is set correctly. I've been debugging an activity that starts from a shell script (as activities using libsugarize are prone to do) and the script assumes (correctly) that CWD is the activity directory. So I am intrigued about Aleksey's patch. Aleksey -- did you prep your patch in response to an observed behaviour? What was it? Maybe the problem was misdiagnosed? cheers, m -- martin.langh...@gmail.com mar...@laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
