The fact is that i had not read well my repository page => the ssh tabs give us the good adress, though the informations still says us to use git:// adress.
But to the way of learning versions control, i've gone one step further. Thanks :) Regards 2011/6/4 James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> > On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 04:06:43PM +1000, James Cameron wrote: > > I'm shocked and surprised. Why did you say no? You should say yes at > > this point. I can confirm that the RSA key fingerprint of > > git.sugarlabs.org is indeed what you see displayed. Please try again, > > and this time say yes. > > It has been pointed out that this text of mine is open to an alternative > interpretation of harshness. That was not my intent. I omitted several > other emotions: > > - saddened that this use of SSH is so complex, > > - annoyed that I didn't think of this before, > > - irritated that mentoring a new developer to this point is far too > complex. > > [/me turns to the new developer] I think you have done well to get > where you are, and I care enough to help you get further. I don't like > how complex it is. While I can understand the complexity because of > much practice, that doesn't mean the complexity is good. > > The use of GIT over SSH in this case seems to be an instance of "the > perfect being the enemy of the good", as Jim Gettys said in his Google > talk recently. > > -- > James Cameron > http://quozl.linux.org.au/ >
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel