Hi Manuel, On 25 Jul 2011, at 05:12, manuel quiñones wrote:
> Hello, > > Thanks Gary for your support. I'm with you, option 1 is the ideal. > Unfortunatly it doesn't seem to be possible in current GTK. Yea, that's what I suspected, but thanks for considering it. > So I took > option 2, at least for the moment. Here are new screenshots: > > http://dev.laptop.org/~manuq/record_design/timer_sshot.png Thanks for the screen shots. Yes, that does work better for my eye at least – could you perhaps use the star placement of the 3 star version, and centre align the 1 and 2 star versions around the middle star of the 3 star version? (e.g. use the 3 star version centre star, as the placement for the 1 star version, and then place stars in the gaps either side for the 2 star version). That should give the 1 and 2 star versions some more comfortable clearance from the clock stroke edge. > http://dev.laptop.org/~manuq/record_design/duration_sshot.png Fab, looks good :) > If you think this is ok, I have a patch ready for Daniel's review. Yes, a +1 from me with the above tweak to the 1 & 2 star versions (if you are also happy with the star alignment tweak as well). Regards, --Gary > 2011/7/22 Daniel Drake <[email protected]>: >> On 22 July 2011 23:43, Gary Martin <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Oooh, thanks, will take a look. So I'm assuming you didn't take to option >>> 2? Be one with multiple icons and just try to make each one of them >>> meaningful? >> >> I'd be fine with option 2 if Manuel agrees and makes the icons. >> >> I just experimented with option 1 as I was in a position to do so. I'm >> no good with artwork stuff! >> >> Daniel >> > > -- > .. manuq .. _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
