On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Sascha Silbe <si...@activitycentral.com> wrote: > I'd argue that Sugar shouldn't store the secrets at all but rather let > NetworkManager take care of that.
I agree, and this is exactly how my code works. That is unrelated to the issue at hand. A SecretAgent implementation is still required for telling NM those secrets in the first place, so the question still stands. Thanks, Daniel _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
