On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Walter Bender <[email protected]>wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Samuel Greenfeld <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > There is some debate to that on various mailing lists.
> >
> > Some of the support libraries used are known to be be LGPL or GPL based,
> but
> > in the case of one GPL program (gpsbabel) is known to be isolated as a
> > seperate executable.  Other items like Qt potentially could have be
> licensed
> > via alternative means.
> >
> > The EULA at http://www.google.com/earth/download/ge/agree.html forbids
> > redistribution, so the entire package might not be GPL'd.
> >
> > Someone would have to contact Google to figure out what's going on.
>
> Bradley at the SFC agreed to look into it for us.
>
> -walter
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Walter Bender <[email protected]
> >
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Peter Robinson <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Walter Bender <
> [email protected]>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 6:20 AM, Peter Robinson <
> [email protected]>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>> Are we really allowed to use the name "google earth"?
> >> >>
> >> >> Good question. Not sure. We should probably choose a Sugar-ized verb
> >> >> name anyway.
> >> >
> >> > And looking at the ASLO page it states that its GPLv2. I very much
> >> > doubt that to be the case!
> >>
> >> I am pretty sure it is GPL. The map data is not, but the software is.
> >>
> >> -walter
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Peter
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Walter Bender
> >> Sugar Labs
> >> http://www.sugarlabs.org
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Sugar-devel mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Walter Bender
> Sugar Labs
> http://www.sugarlabs.org
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>

This is troublesome, as also some of the distro packages of this have gpl
licences on it.

on doubt we should wait for a lawyer perspective.
_______________________________________________
Sugar-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Reply via email to