But I don't think is a good idea add a activity without a maintainer. Gonzalo
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Sebastian Silva <sebast...@somosazucar.org>wrote: > Actually if the license permits it, there isnt a necessity to await > confirmation by original author, although it would be nice to ask, IMHO > > El 14/12/11 19:46, Rafael Ortiz escribió: > > > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn < > alan...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> It's ok uploading those to aslo, if they have OSI compliant >> Licences, pointing to original devs, also if they provide a good sugar >> experience. More info here: >> >> >> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Activity_Library/Editors/Policy#Guidelines_for_accepting_an_activity >> >> >> >> Ok. The "importants" are in ASLO.. maybe there are some that not.. >> >> I could test some and upload them. But corresponds me to do that? I do >> not want to override the original developers .. >> > > it's necessary to ask first the original devs. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing > listSugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.orghttp://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > > > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > >
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
