On 01/30/2012 10:26 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
Hi Gary,
thanks for the feedback!
On 01/29/2012 05:46 PM, Gary Martin wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 28 Jan 2012, at 14:20, Simon Schampijer<si...@schampijer.de> wrote:
On 01/28/2012 01:44 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
On 01/26/2012 07:15 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
On 01/24/2012 09:56 PM, Sascha Silbe wrote:
From: Aleksey Lim<alsr...@activitycentral.org>
Both individual users and deployments need to be able to set a
proxy for
Sugar and activities to use. While we'd like the system to work
that all
out automatically (e.g. using WPAD [1]), this often isn't possible.
Common
reasons include legacy ("inherited") setups and network uplinks
simply
being
out of control of the user respectively deployment.
For consistency between Sugar and Gnome (and to the benefit of
existing users
who currently switch to Gnome to change proxy settings), the
layout of
the
Gnome proxy settings dialog has been mirrored as much as possible.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_Proxy_Autodiscovery_Protocol
Signed-off-by: Anish Mangal<an...@sugarlabs.org>
[replaced description; merged fix-up patches from Aleksey; style
fixes;
added WPAD hint; fixed needs_restart defaults bug]
Signed-off-by: Sascha Silbe<si...@activitycentral.com>
---
When applying the patch me and Manuel get: "fatal: corrupt patch at
line
414"
Regards,
Simon
I removed the icon which caused the bug and now the patch does apply.
Regards,
Simon
I still think merging the proxy option inside the network section of
the Control Panel makes more sense than having a separate section.
Here is how the network section looks in GNOME3 [1][2][3].
And here is a short cody-mockup that shows how it could look like in
Sugar [4][5] (I am running the XO settings).
If we re-arrange the text of the wireless sub-section and
collaboration sub-section a bit I think we can even get away with
scrolling there.
Yes, it's better to try and keep these network related settings in the
one CP module. I'm also fine with it triggering scrolling when needed
as these settings are already very technical/admin in nature. Re your
mockup, think the new proxy section should go a the bottom of the
list, below the existing collaboration server entry.
Yes, sounds good to put the proxy setting on the bottom. Will code the
section up today and send new mockups.
Regards,
Simon
Following the recommendations in [1] I have been applying a workaround
in GTK2 to get a better wrapping for the labels *. This leads to the
following control panel [2] (much better than [3]). So adding the option
will show the 'main'-section on an XO without scrolling, reducing the
'we need an extra section because of scrolling' argument to a minimum,
scrolling should only be needed when there is a non-None proxy [4].
Regards,
Simon
* have to check what the situation is like in GTK3
[1] http://www.16software.com/blog/dynamic-label-wrapping-in-gtk
[2] https://dev.laptop.org/~erikos/designs/proxy_none_2.png
[3] https://dev.laptop.org/~erikos/designs/proxy_none.png
[4] https://dev.laptop.org/~erikos/designs/proxy_automatic_2.png
_______________________________________________
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
