Yes, I should include the language coverage as a topic. Thanks Chris for remember.
Gonzalo On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 1:34 AM, Chris Leonard <[email protected]>wrote: > All, > > It might be of interest to review this earlier incarnation of a font > thread (started by Sridhar from AU). > > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2012-January/014825.html > > One element that is critical in all of this, of course, is taking some > care to investigate the range of languages that any given font can > represent. I'm sure that much of the discussion will focus on > Latin-based alphabets, which is fine as far as it goes, and they will > often cover Cyrillic as well; but I think an absolutely clear > understanding of the language coverage offered by a particular font is > essential before making any 'default' choice. > > cjl > Sugar Labs Translation Team Coordinator > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
