On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 10:58:42AM +0530, Ajay Garg wrote: > == JUST ONE LAST QUERY == > > Is the "disable-mesh-patch" the only difference between the following :: > > > kernel-2.6.35.13_xo1-20120502.1603.olpc.bde819f.i586 > (kernel generated by you) > kernel-2.6.35.13_xo1-20111005.1403.olpc.c2bd7b9.i586 > (original kernel present on XO-1)
The seven characters between olpc. and .i586 are the git hash for the olpc-2.6.35 branch in the git repository git://dev.laptop.org/olpc-kernel These tell you which git hash was used to build the kernel. The hash c2bd7b9 is two patches away from bde819f in the branch log. [1] One patch [3] is what Paul did for you. The other patch [2] is XO-1.5 specific. So for your purposes, yes, it is the only difference. You can see a list of previous official kernels. [4] References: 1. http://dev.laptop.org/git/olpc-kernel/?h=olpc-2.6.35 2. http://dev.laptop.org/git/olpc-kernel/commit/?h=olpc-2.6.35&id=5d76efb5df8c6b1d181c47b17b1d1e9a39ef66b6 ov7670: Disable non-YUV modes on XO-1.5 (#11297) Non YUV modes cannot be scaled by the via-camera driver without messing up the colours in the image. 3. http://dev.laptop.org/git/olpc-kernel/commit/?h=olpc-2.6.35&id=bde819fe60fdc8ca7c7d6e0552105d0438cc7f89 libertas: Add libertas_disablemesh module parameter to disable mesh interfaceolpc-2.6.35 This allows individual users and deployments to disable mesh support at runtime, i.e. without having to build and maintain a custom kernel. 4. http://dev.laptop.org/~kernels/f14-xo1/?C=M;O=D -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel