> We should not be using dotted version numbers for activities intended to be > installed at deployments running builds older than Sugar 0.92.0. In Uruguay, one week ago, the latest image was Sugar 0.88 !Now (by luck) we have Sugar 0.94 :-) In others deployments, what Sugar version are their using? For example, have sense maintain in the code "back compatibility" with sugar < 0.86 ?? Regards! Alan
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
