Julia Reynolds (copied) is working on updating the Help content, based in the work done here:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Help_Activity_refresh http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Help_Activity_refresh/TOC May be she can tell us what is the actual state. I was looking at Mallard, but I didn't wanted impose over the people writing the content, the charge of learning a new markup. For us, is difficult found people available to write the content, (the last full manual is from Sugar 0.82) then, I think we should try to get the help written, and later, we can see and translate to other markup if is useful. What is the benefit of using Mallard? I don't see how we can join forces in this particular case. Gonzalo On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 8:24 AM, Manuel QuiƱones <ma...@laptop.org> wrote: > 2012/7/26 Manuel Kaufmann <humi...@gmail.com>: >> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:49 PM, Gary Martin >> <garycmar...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>> Ideally we'd have just one maintained simple Help activity, with the html >>> content swapped in for various language translations. >> >> What is the actual format of those files? I thought it was .rst, but >> it seems that I'm confused. > > Thanks for raising this topic, there are some questions at GUADEC > about how we are behaving regarding documentation. > > I think we should use Mallard in the future, as GNOME is using it to > display the help of the apps with the Yelp browser. And It's > important to join forces. > > http://projectmallard.org/ > > I wonder what happened with the refresh of the Help content: > > http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Help_Activity_refresh/TOC > > Cheers, > > -- > .. manuq .. > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel