On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarv...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Can you elaborate on the reason? Refining features might require > breaking String/UI/ABI? > > Usually, we have a date to decide when a Feature is accepted or should be in the next cycle, but after that, can be included small changes. Also Features are big changes, we want get them included soon, but can be other fixes or changes requiring string or UI changes allowed later in the cycle. Gonzalo > On 27 March 2013 15:30, Gonzalo Odiard <gonz...@laptop.org> wrote: > > IMHO, Feature should not be frozen at the same time than String, UI and > ABI > > > > Gonzalo > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarv...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> here is an initial schedule for 0.100 > >> > >> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.100/Roadmap > >> > >> Notes: > >> > >> * Still unclear if it's going to be 0.100 or 1.0. We should probably > >> decide after we know what the focus of the release is going to be. > >> * I have not allocated dates for unstable tarballs. Is it actually > >> worth spending time building those? Is anyone using them? > >> * I merged a few freezes together to simplify things. > >> * Relevant GNOME and Fedora schedules are still unknown so I couldn't > >> try to sync with those. > >> > >> Thoughts? > >> > >> -- > >> Daniel Narvaez > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Sugar-devel mailing list > >> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > > > > > > > -- > Daniel Narvaez >
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
