On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:19 AM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarv...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 28 March 2013 10:52, Simon Schampijer <si...@schampijer.de> wrote: >> I read a bit about the differences. For a purist the 'is not using free >> software on their server' springs to mind. But maybe let's focus on the work >> flow first. > > Though are there any relevant web apps which are free software? And > despite that we are all using them... > >> The merge requests on gitorious I never used. Maybe because I was too >> focused on the bug tracker or patch on email work flow. It does make sense >> to have a pull workflow for bigger changes that are linked to each other, >> for example a port-shell-to-gtk3 project.
FWIW, I found merge-requests on gitorious to be much easier to explain and manage with newbies such as the Google Code In students. And they are visible. But I have not had much luck getting the veteran Sugar developers to acknowledge or accept patches through that mechanism. >> >> I should check if I can get used to that as a general work flow model. Maybe >> I check with the ayopa project to get a feeling for it. > > Yeah, I was proposing to give it a try to see if it works well in general. > > Btw I tend to think if we splitted patches a lot more then we are > currently doing reviews would be easier, though that might be personal > taste. With multiple patches as you say, the pull workflow should work > better than the others. > > Anyway I think a github workflow would cover three important things > we care about > > * Patches are visible to anyone. > * Patches are trackable. > * Integration with issues tracking. > > Of course it migth introduce other problems :) > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel