Oh, we should release it then. Can you, Gary? 2013/5/10 James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org>: > On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 10:55:51AM +1000, James Cameron wrote: >> Summary: this Clock activity consumes significantly less CPU on XO-4 >> and XO-1 when implemented in Javascript. > > Myth busted. See new results in context below. > >> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 08:42:18PM -0300, Manuel Qui?ones wrote: >> > 2013/4/30 James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org>: >> > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 08:58:50AM -0300, Manuel Qui?ones wrote: >> > >> Should work on other browsers now: >> > >> >> > >> http://manuq.github.io/clockjs/ >> > > >> > > Agreed, works well, reasonably low CPU utilisation. Thanks. >> > >> > Excellent. Thanks for checking the CPU consumption. >> >> Here's a more detailed check. Method is to run only the activity >> under test, and use the serial port to run the Linux top command >> configured for a 30 second sample time. >> >> -- >> >> On XO-4 using 13.1.0: >> >> - using Javascript, the Browse-149 process consumes 7.5% CPU, and the >> X process 3.2% CPU. Total of 10.7% CPU. >> >> - not using Javascript, the Clock-12 process consumes 2.7% CPU, and >> the X process 13.2% CPU. Total of 15.9% CPU. > > Clock-12.5 process consumes 0.6%, and the X process 2.0%, a total of > 2.6%. > >> -- >> >> On XO-1 using 13.2.0, build 32004o0, >> >> - using Javascript, the Browse-149.2 process consumes 9.8%, the X >> process 7.4%, a total of 17.2%, >> >> - not using Javascript, the Clock-12 process consumes 10.4% and X >> process consumes 18.4%, a total of 30.8%. > > Clock-12.5 process consumes 1.5%, and the X process 3.6%, a total of > 5.1%. > >> >> -- >> >> On XO-1 using 11.3.0, build 883, >> >> - using Javascript, the Browse 129.1 does not render the script, >> >> - not using Javascript, the Clock-6 consumes 7.0%, and X consumed >> 9.0%, a total of 16%. > > Test not repeated. > > -- > James Cameron > http://quozl.linux.org.au/
-- .. manuq .. _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel