On 20 May 2013 13:55, Manuel Quiñones <ma...@laptop.org> wrote: > > > Why does that bother you? :) > > > > I mean there is just a single build directory there and everything else > is > > source. Which is the opposite of before, with a source dir and everything > > else being build script. I'd argue the main focus should be on the > source so > > it make sense to have that at the toplevel :) > > > Ah, that confused me too because I pulled sugar-build instead of doing > a new clone, and now my directories are mixed. So looks like I can > now remove source/ logs/ and install/ >
Yeah, I'm sure it gets messy on a non-clean clone. I'm interested in everyone opinion of the new directory structure on a clean clone though. If people prefers a source/ dir we can easily change that. It's just that it's going to require a full pull/build for everyone again... so I will try to be a more bit careful this time :)
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
