On 05/28/2013 01:16 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 May 2013, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
[..]
* Split the compilation, one part to compile sugar and another to compile
sugar-web,
sugar-web is more unstable, and have a lot of issues.
This would add more maintenance, buildbot etc work that I personally don't
have time to do. I welcome anyone to jump in and maintain a
sugar-without-html build if it is considered necessary.
IMO we decided that HTML activities was the main goal for the release and
it would good if it was more of a collective effort, including testing and
fixing the build. Right now is mostly just me and Manuel... Most other
people seems to be annoyed by the build issues rather than trying to
participate. If we wanted to have only a small part of the team work on it
and the rest not being bothered by the changes, it would have been better
to work on a branch until stuff was more stable.
If we do not use mainline for such a big effort like html5 activities we
won't be able to achieve our goals because only a few people will work
on it as the others are not bothered. This has to be disruptive.
I agree with Daniel that we should group around our goal. And that not
only Daniel is responsible for keeping the build
infrastructure/environment running. Maybe he has raised expectations
high by maintaining it so well over the last months.
Regards,
Simon
_______________________________________________
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
