On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Basanta Shrestha <basanta.shres...@olenepal.org> wrote: > Adding fedora=fedora_update and rebuilding didn't work.
And Daniel suggested you didn't do that anyway, there's been a big change delta since OLPC branched off the F17 release so without testing I'm not particularly surprised. > Jerry, As you suggested it installed all the required newer > firefox,xulrunner and nss... packages but the resulting image couldn't boot > the XO. Now I am going for your second suggestion. I have created a local > repo for firefox, xulrunner and other dependencies( 9 altogether) . Could > you please check if the entries are right? Does it work if you just yum install them? > /root/local/.repo > > ------------------ > [local] > name=firefox-xulrunner local > baseurl=file:///root/local/ > gpgcheck=0 > enabled=1 > ------------------ > > olpc-os-12.1.0-xo1.75.ini > > Right below [repos] section > > ---------------------- > [custom_repo] > local=1,firefox,file:///root/local/ > ---------------------- > > > > > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Jerry Vonau <jvo...@shaw.ca> wrote: >> >> On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 15:22 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: >> > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Daniel Drake <d...@laptop.org> wrote: >> > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Peter Robinson >> > > <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> Firefox and xulrunner 17 are the late known good (and matching) >> > >> builds >> > >> for Fedora 17, you need the major versions to be matching (so >> > >> 12/13/17) but if you were pulling in all the latest stable updates >> > >> into the build you would have matching ones AFAICT from koji so >> > >> there's some other issue. >> > > >> > > Ah yes, you are right, the latest available versions on koji are >> > > matching (v17) and built OK. I didn't spot them in the mass of failed >> > > builds. So the Fedora situation is OK. >> > > >> > >> I'm not sure what the following lines translate to but you should >> > >> never use the koji repositories as repos as they contain all sorts of >> > >> randomly tagged bits that the release repos don't. >> > >> >> > >> olpc_frozen_1=0,koji.dist-f17-armv7hl >> > >> olpc_frozen_2=0,koji.dist-f17-armv7hl-updates-12.1.0 >> > > >> > > Don't worry, these are not the koji repos you are thinking of. They >> > > are OLPC's frozen versions of fedora repos from the release's freeze >> > > date and are not directly from koji - really we should change the >> > > naming scheme. >> > > >> > > And this is the cause of the problem - upon release freeze date, the >> > > firefox/xulrunner situation was in inconsistent state; this problem >> > > has been frozen in our repos. >> > > >> > > Basanta, I would advise against adding the official fedora-updates >> > > repo into your build as has been suggested in this thread - while this >> > > will result in a well matched firefox/xulrunner combination, it will >> > > bring in a lot of untested package updates that were not part of the >> > > release and have probably not been tested on OLPC XO. >> > > >> >> That is why later in the thread I suggested to download what yum >> installed on the XO, then create and use a custom repo for OOB. >> >> > > Instead, create a local repo with these 2 packages and add it to your >> > > build config: >> > > http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=109570 >> > > http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=116355 >> > >> > It will need newer nss*/nspr builds too. >> > >> > Peter >> >> Jerry >> >> >> >> >> > > > > -- > Basanta Shrestha > Network Engineer > Open Learning Exchange (OLE) Nepal > Tel: +977.1.5544441, 5520075 Ext. 303 > Cell: +977.9818 605110 > http://www.olenepal.org > > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > de...@lists.laptop.org > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel > _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel