> I removed support for gtk2 activities from sugar-build because I wanted to > simplify things a bit. The new html stuff added a lot of dependencies and > modules, it was getting out of control. > > But nothing other then sugar-build changed, in respect to gtk2. Any reason > you can't use the Fedora sugar packages? > > IMO it doesn't make sense to keep working on gtk2 activities. They should > be ported first. But that's just my opinion, I'm sure there are people that > disagree. > > IMHO, should be good keep supporting gtk2 on sugar-build.
Gonzalo
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
