On Thursday, 6 June 2013, Simon Schampijer wrote: > On 06/06/2013 11:34 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > >> On Thursday, 6 June 2013, Simon Schampijer wrote: >> >> On 06/06/2013 01:17 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I setup a fork of webL10n. I amdified it and replaced API with the gaia >>>> one >>>> minus the b2g specific stuff. >>>> >>>> https://github.com/sugarlabs/****webL10n<https://github.com/sugarlabs/**webL10n> >>>> <https://github.com/**sugarlabs/webL10n<https://github.com/sugarlabs/webL10n> >>>> > >>>> >>>> >>> I do not see any changes from you there, why do we need the for again? >>> >>> >> They are on the sugar-web branch. You mean why we need the changes? Couple >> of reasons, to make it work well with requirejs and to get a better public >> API (the same gaia is using). This code is sort of thought to be forked, >> mozilla are forking it themself despite being the upstream in practice. >> > > Oh, ok - did not see the branch. Thanks, gets clearer now. > > /me has not seen as many forks and copy-pastes as in the last weeks
Welcome to the magic world of JavaScript!! -- Daniel Narvaez
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel