On 20 June 2013 13:28, Walter Bender <walter.ben...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Regarding our broken decision-making process, the problem I have is > less that we don't reach consensus than that the discussions are > happening very late in the process. We had, for example, had an email > from our release manager months ago about the features proposed for > this release. That was the time to question whether or not this > feature should be accepted. To wait until now is not fair to the > person, in the case, Ignacio, who has been working hard on his > implementation. It is fine to give technical criticism at this point, > and I think that discussion has been fruitful, but in my opinion, we > really need to be more forthcoming earlier in the process about the > features themselves. > > I agree about this. I was about to bring it up a couple of times myself but I didn't want to kill the discussion. Fortunately that's a problem with the process and it can be more easily addressed than the general consensus issue.The next time we have a feature discussion we should make sure it's clear that once a decision to include a feature has been made, it has been made... This is probably release manager responsibility, bad me :)
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
