developers should be able to grok sugar-build/activities (as long as it is documented -- see PR-41).
-walter On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 4:13 AM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarv...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > as discussed in another thread, the sugar-toolkit bundlebuilder dev command > is not respecting the SUGAR_ACTIVITIES_PATH (a fix for that landed in > sugar-toolkit-gtk3 recently). > > I wonder if we should just drop the dev command, and suggest to develop > directly in sugar-build/activities (or ~/Activities when outside > sugar-build). All that the command does is to create a symlink anyway, if > someone really wants they can do that themselves easily... As it is, the dev > command feels like unnecessary magic to me. > > -- > Daniel Narvaez -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
